Disclosure: Some links on this page are affiliate links. If you purchase through them, we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Full affiliate disclosure.

BambooHR and Gusto are two of the most popular platforms for managing HR and payroll, but they focus on different areas. BambooHR is a dedicated HRIS (Human Resources Information System) that is good at employee data management, onboarding, time-off tracking, and performance reviews. Gusto is a payroll-first platform that includes HR features, benefits administration, and compliance tools — making it a popular all-in-one choice for small businesses.
📊 How We Compared
The recommendations here consolidate vendor documentation, verified pricing on live pricing pages, and aggregated patterns from 100+ G2 and Capterra reviews per tool. The cost picture assumes a 28-person team — full assumptions are documented in our methodology. Integration coverage for Google Workspace and Slack was checked against vendor documentation and user reports — the two ecosystems our readers ask about most. Each rating weights the six dimensions laid out in our scoring methodology.
For companies that need complete HR management with deep employee records, custom workflows, and performance management, BambooHR is the stronger tool. For small businesses that primarily need reliable payroll with built-in HR basics, Gusto's integrated approach is simpler and more affordable. In this guide, we compare both platforms across features, pricing, ease of use, and best-fit scenarios.
Editor’s take: If you asked our team to pick one for a friend: BambooHR. The reason isn't on the comparison table — it's how the product behaves at month six, not week one.
These two are often compared as if they compete directly, but they start from different places: one is an HR system of record that added payroll, the other is a payroll engine that grew into HR. If payroll accuracy and tax filing are the pain, start from the payroll side; if employee records, onboarding and time off are the pain, start from the HR side. Most regret comes from buying the wrong direction first.
| Feature | BambooHR | Gusto |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $5.25/employee/mo + base fee | $39/mo + $6/employee/mo (Simple) |
| Free trial | 7 days (request demo) | No (but month-to-month) |
| Core strength | HRIS and employee management | Payroll and benefits |
| Payroll processing | Add-on (BambooHR Payroll) | Built-in (full-service) |
| Benefits administration | Yes | Yes (excellent) |
| Onboarding | Yes (excellent) | Yes (basic) |
| Performance reviews | Yes (add-on) | Yes (basic) |
| Time tracking | Add-on | Yes (included) |
| Best for | Mid-size companies (25-500) | Small businesses (1-100) |
BambooHR is built around a centralized employee database. Every employee has a complete record that includes personal information, job history, compensation, documents, time-off balances, and custom fields. The org chart is automatically generated from reporting relationships, and HR can set custom access levels so managers only see their direct reports. For companies that need deep employee data management, BambooHR is best-in-class.
Gusto also maintains employee records, but they are less detailed than BambooHR's. Gusto's employee profiles focus on payroll-relevant information — compensation, tax withholding, bank accounts, and benefits enrollment. While sufficient for small businesses, Gusto does not offer the same level of customization or depth for HR data management.
Gusto is a full-service payroll platform. It handles federal, state, and local tax filing automatically, calculates garnishments, processes direct deposits, and files year-end tax forms (W-2s, 1099s). Gusto also supports multi-state payroll, contractor payments, and off-cycle pay runs. The payroll interface is intuitive, and most small businesses can run payroll in minutes.
BambooHR Payroll is available as an add-on to the core HRIS. It offers similar functionality — tax filing, direct deposit, year-end forms — but is less mature than Gusto's payroll engine. Many BambooHR customers use a separate payroll provider (like Gusto, ADP, or Paychex) and integrate it with BambooHR for HR management. If payroll is your primary need, Gusto is the stronger choice.
BambooHR's onboarding is excellent. New hires receive a welcome email with a link to complete their profile, sign documents electronically, and review company policies. HR can create onboarding checklists that auto-assign tasks to different team members (IT sets up laptop, manager assigns training, etc.). The onboarding experience is customizable and creates a strong first impression for new employees.
Gusto offers onboarding through its hiring and onboarding tools. New hires can complete tax forms, sign offer letters, and enroll in benefits through Gusto. While functional, Gusto's onboarding is more transactional — focused on payroll setup rather than the full employee experience. For companies that want a welcoming, complete onboarding process, BambooHR is superior.
Gusto is good at benefits administration. It offers integrated health insurance brokerage in supported states, allowing businesses to compare and purchase medical, dental, and vision plans directly through Gusto. Employees can enroll in benefits during open enrollment or life events, and deductions are automatically calculated in payroll. Gusto also supports 401(k), HSA, FSA, and commuter benefits.
BambooHR also offers benefits administration, including open enrollment workflows, benefit plan comparisons, and ACA reporting. However, BambooHR does not act as an insurance broker — you need to work with a broker separately. For small businesses that want a one-stop shop for benefits and payroll, Gusto's integrated approach is more convenient.
BambooHR offers a performance management add-on that includes performance reviews, goal tracking, 360-degree feedback, and performance notes. The system supports custom review cycles, self-assessments, and manager evaluations. For companies that want structured performance management integrated with their HRIS, BambooHR provides a solid solution.
Gusto added performance reviews to its platform, but the feature is relatively basic — simple review templates and goal tracking. For serious performance management, BambooHR is the better choice. Many Gusto users integrate with dedicated performance tools like Lattice or 15Five.
Gusto is widely praised for its ease of use. The interface is clean and modern, payroll runs are guided step-by-step, and the employee self-service portal is intuitive. Small business owners without HR or payroll expertise can confidently use Gusto. The platform also provides compliance alerts and state-specific guidance to help businesses stay on track.
BambooHR is also user-friendly, with a clean interface and logical navigation. However, because it offers more depth, there is more to learn. HR administrators typically need a few days of training to fully utilize BambooHR's features. For employees, the self-service portal is straightforward — requesting time off, viewing pay stubs, and updating personal information.
BambooHR: Custom (typically $6-$12/employee/mo). Free tier: No free tier.
Gusto: $40/mo base + $6/employee/mo. Free tier: No free tier.
Gusto publishes its rates: $40/month base plus $6 per employee, putting 10 people at about $100/month. BambooHR quotes custom, typically in the $6–$12 per-employee range, which lands a 10-person team somewhere between $60 and $120/month. The practical difference is that you will not know BambooHR's real number until you sit through a sales call.
BambooHR: 100+ (Payroll, ATS, SSO, Slack) integrations, including key business tools.
Gusto: 200+ (QuickBooks, Xero, Slack, Greenhouse) integrations, including key business tools.
Choose BambooHR if: Small to mid-size companies, core HR management. Key strengths include Employee database, PTO tracking.
Choose Gusto if: Small businesses needing payroll + basic HR. Key strengths include Full-service payroll, Benefits administration.
Switching project management tools is not trivial. Both BambooHR and Gusto offer data import tools (CSV, integrations with other platforms), but expect 1-2 weeks of team adjustment regardless of which tool you migrate to. During migration, run both tools in parallel to avoid data loss and give your team time to adapt to new workflows.
| Plan | BambooHR | Gusto |
|---|---|---|
| Entry | ~$5.25/employee/mo + base fee | $39/mo + $6/employee/mo |
| Mid-tier | ~$8/employee/mo + base fee | $39/mo + $12/employee/mo |
| Premium | Custom pricing | Custom pricing |
BambooHR's pricing requires a quote based on company size and selected features, making direct comparison difficult. In general, BambooHR is more expensive than Gusto for small businesses (under 25 employees) but can be more cost-effective for mid-size companies (100+ employees). For a 20-person company, Gusto costs approximately $159/month, while BambooHR with payroll may cost $250-$350/month.
BambooHR is ideal for mid-size companies (25-500 employees) that need a dedicated HRIS. If your HR team manages employee records, onboarding, time-off requests, performance reviews, and custom HR workflows, BambooHR provides the depth and customization you need. It is particularly popular with professional services firms, technology companies, and organizations with dedicated HR staff.
Gusto is the go-to choice for small businesses (1-100 employees) that need reliable payroll and benefits without the complexity of a full HRIS. If you are a founder, office manager, or part-time HR person running payroll, Gusto's simplicity and integrated benefits make it the most practical choice. Startups, retail businesses, restaurants, and small agencies all benefit from Gusto's all-in-one approach.
BambooHR offers a free demo. Gusto offers month-to-month pricing with no long-term contract.
BambooHR scores 8.5 for being the best dedicated HRIS for mid-size companies. Its employee data management, onboarding, and performance features are excellent. Gusto scores 8.4 for being the best payroll and benefits platform for small businesses. Its ease of use and integrated approach make it the most accessible HR and payroll tool on the market.
For small businesses that prioritize payroll, Gusto is the clear winner — it handles payroll, taxes, and benefits in one affordable package. For growing companies that need structured HR management, BambooHR provides the depth and customization that Gusto lacks. Many businesses use both: Gusto for payroll and BambooHR for HR, connected through an integration. If you can only choose one, let your company size and primary need guide the decision.

For small businesses that prioritize payroll, Gusto is the clear winner — it handles payroll, taxes, and benefits in one affordable package. For growing companies that need structured HR management, BambooHR provides the depth and customization that Gusto lacks.
BambooHR is sold on quote rather than a published price, while Gusto is transparent at $40/mo base plus $6/employee/mo, which makes Gusto easier to budget for a ten-person team. The real split is what you are buying: Gusto bundles payroll, taxes and benefits into one package, while BambooHR sells depth in employee records, onboarding, time-off and performance management. If payroll is the job, Gusto wins; if HR records are the job, BambooHR does.
BambooHR is ideal for mid-size companies (25-500 employees) that need a dedicated HRIS. If your HR team manages employee records, onboarding, time-off requests, performance reviews, and custom HR workflows, BambooHR provides the depth and customization you need.
Yes, and it is a common setup for companies that outgrow Gusto's HR features but want to keep its payroll. The two integrate, so employee records stay in one place while payroll runs in the other. The cost is maintaining the connection and reconciling two bills instead of one.
Gusto, because its pricing is published. BambooHR is sold on quote, so the number depends on company size and which modules you take. If a predictable monthly cost matters more than HR depth, that transparency is worth a lot. If you need the depth, budget time for the sales process as well as the subscription.